Ananda Vikatan row: Indian magazines condemn blocking of satirical cartoon

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Ananda Vikatan row: Indian magazines condemn blocking of satirical cartoon" has 655 words across 26 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 6 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Ananda Vikatan row: Indian magazines condemn blocking of satirical cartoon" was covered 3 days ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 151 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 3 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #26269295</li><li>URL: https://chronographically.beamstart.com/news/ananda-vikatan-row-indian-magazines-17399580228968</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 3d ago

Ananda Vikatan row: Indian magazines condemn blocking of satirical cartoon - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

The move has been widely criticised as an attack on press freedom, especially as it was done without prior notice or explanation to the Tamil magazine.

While the government has yet to release an official statement on the matter, media watchdogs and journalist associations have expressed concern over the precedent this move sets for digital media in India.

However, the MIB confirmed that the website had already been blocked the previous day and chose not to disclose any details about the IDC’s proceedings, citing confidentiality concerns.