Greenpeace raises threat of new legal challenge to UK oil and gasfields

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Greenpeace raises threat of new legal challenge to UK oil and gasfields" has 747 words across 30 sentences, which will take approximately 4 - 7 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Greenpeace raises threat of new legal challenge to UK oil and gasfields" was covered 1 days ago by Financial Times, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Financial Times' news outlet?

Financial Times is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1888 that covers mostly markets, finance, and investing news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 16 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 8 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #27640483</li><li>URL: https://chronographically.beamstart.com/news/greenpeace-raises-threat-of-new-17439989333138</li></ul>

Financial Times 1d ago

Greenpeace raises threat of new legal challenge to UK oil and gasfields - Financial Times

Quick Summary:

But following legal challenges from Greenpeace and Uplift, Scotland’s top civil court in January ruled the consents would need to be reconsidered to take into account carbon dioxide emitted when the oil and gas is used.

Meanwhile, the Financial Times quoted a government ally” in February as saying “the new applications will have to pass the new regime but our position on existing fields is very clear: we support them”.

Rosebank and Jackdaw developers will need to apply again for consent if they want the projects to go ahead, and authorities would need to consider this in line with the courts’ ruling.