Manila court issues HDO vs 30 policemen in bungled drugs bust

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Manila court issues HDO vs 30 policemen in bungled drugs bust" has 695 words across 21 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 6 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Manila court issues HDO vs 30 policemen in bungled drugs bust" was covered 2 days ago by Business Mirror, a news publisher based in Philippines.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Mirror' news outlet?

Business Mirror is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2005 that covers mostly business and startups news. The outlet is headquartered in Philippines and publishes an average of 62 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 8 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #25577457</li><li>URL: https://chronographically.beamstart.com/news/manila-court-issues-hdo-vs-17380683773335</li></ul>

Business Mirror Logo Business Mirror 2d ago

Manila court issues HDO vs 30 policemen in bungled drugs bust - Business Mirror

Quick Summary:

THE Regional Trial Court in Manila has issued a hold departure order (HDO) against 30 policemen who were earlier charged with violation of Republic Act 9165 or the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 "for bungling the prosecution of drug cases” in connection with the seizure of 900 kilos of methamphetamine hydrochloride or shabu worth P6.7 billion in 2022.

Domingo and police officials identified as Julian T.Olonan, Dhefry A.Punzalan, Jonathan G.Sosongco, Carlos C.Bayeta, Hustin Peter A.Gular, Rommer I.Bugarin, Hassan O.Kalaw, Dennis L.

However, the Department of Justice (DOJ) held that the indictment of Mayo and Atadero “were predicated on the simulated operations” that the accused policemen conducted.