No interference in Muslims' religious matters: Amit Shah on Waqf Bill

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "No interference in Muslims&#039; religious matters: Amit Shah on Waqf Bill" has 938 words across 28 sentences, which will take approximately 4 - 8 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "No interference in Muslims&#039; religious matters: Amit Shah on Waqf Bill" was covered 1 days ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 292 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #27544557</li><li>URL: https://chronographically.beamstart.com/news/no-interference-in-muslims-religious-1743610641490</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 1d ago

No interference in Muslims' religious matters: Amit Shah on Waqf Bill - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

The ruling NDA on Wednesday launched a feisty defence of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha amid the opposition's charge that it was unconstitutional and targeted Muslims, as Home Minister Amit Shah asserted that the government had no intention of interfering in their religious matters and was solely driven by the aim of transparent administration of Waqf properties.

Shah's intervention came during the day-long debate that witnessed a fierce exchange between the two sides, with Congress Deputy Leader Gaurav Gogoi alleging that the bill was an attempt to attack the basic structure of the Constitution, defame minorities, disenfranchise them and divide the society.

Minorities Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju in his opening remarks rejected the allegation that the proposed law was an interference in the constitutionally guaranteed freedom in religious affairs.