Parts casting aspersions on Parl panel on Waqf bill report removed: Rijiju

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Parts casting aspersions on Parl panel on Waqf bill report removed: Rijiju" has 302 words across 9 sentences, which will take approximately 2 - 3 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Parts casting aspersions on Parl panel on Waqf bill report removed: Rijiju" was covered 8 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 277 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #26115262</li><li>URL: https://chronographically.beamstart.com/news/parts-casting-aspersions-on-parl-17394381369618</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 8h ago

Parts casting aspersions on Parl panel on Waqf bill report removed: Rijiju - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

Amid opposition uproar over dissent notes being allegedly deleted from the JPC report on the Waqf amendment bill, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju on Thursday said certain portions which amounted to casting aspersions on the panel itself were redacted.

Opposition MPs led by Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge said that dissent notes were "redacted" from the report after it was tabled by BJP member Medha Vishram Kulkarni in the Upper House.

At a press conference in Parliament House complex, Rijiju said, "If there is something in the note which the chairman feels is tantamount to casting aspersions on the committee itself, he has power to remove it".