Quashing of showcause notices: NFRA moves apex court against HC ruling

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Quashing of showcause notices: NFRA moves apex court against HC ruling" has 104 words across 4 sentences, which will take approximately 1 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Quashing of showcause notices: NFRA moves apex court against HC ruling" was covered 1 weeks ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 170 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #26151972</li><li>URL: https://chronographically.beamstart.com/news/quashing-of-showcause-notices-nfra-17395566787838</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 1w ago

Quashing of showcause notices: NFRA moves apex court against HC ruling - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.

It is learnt that NFRA has cited a previous order by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, which found the regulator in compliance with the law regarding the division of functions, and the subsequent Supreme Court orders upholding the tribunal’s ruling.

The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court against a recent Delhi High Court order quashing 11 of the audit regulator’s show cause notices on grounds of violating the “division of functions” norm, according to people in the know.