SC upholds acquittal of JKSLF members in 1990 kidnapping, murder case

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "SC upholds acquittal of JKSLF members in 1990 kidnapping, murder case" has 589 words across 19 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 5 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "SC upholds acquittal of JKSLF members in 1990 kidnapping, murder case" was covered 21 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 103 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #27237553</li><li>URL: https://chronographically.beamstart.com/news/sc-upholds-acquittal-of-jkslf-17426420881301</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 21h ago

SC upholds acquittal of JKSLF members in 1990 kidnapping, murder case - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

The Supreme Court has upheld the acquittal of alleged members of the banned Jammu and Kashmir Students Liberation Front (JKSLF) in the sensational 1990 kidnapping and murder case of the then Kashmir University Vice Chancellor, Mushir-ul-Haq, and his personal secretary.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan dismissed the appeals filed by the CBI challenging the acquittal of seven persons in the case registered under the now-repealed Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA).

The court criticised the handling of the case, saying procedural safeguards were given a "complete go-bye" and truth and justice remained elusive, both for the accused and the victims.