'This was a terrorist attack': US House panel slams NYT's Kashmir coverage

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "&#039;This was a terrorist attack&#039;: US House panel slams NYT&#039;s Kashmir coverage" has 526 words across 20 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 5 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "&#039;This was a terrorist attack&#039;: US House panel slams NYT&#039;s Kashmir coverage" was covered 17 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 320 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 4 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #28203759</li><li>URL: https://chronographically.beamstart.com/news/this-was-a-terrorist-attack-17455607215826</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 17h ago

'This was a terrorist attack': US House panel slams NYT's Kashmir coverage - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

Sharing a screenshot of the original article, the Committee posted: “This was a terrorist attack, plain and simple.

The debate centres around the distinction between “militants” and “terrorists.” While militancy typically refers to armed resistance or insurgency with domestic or political goals, terrorism implies the use of calculated violence, often supported externally, to instil fear and destabilise a nation.

However, The New York Times (NYT) reported the incident using the term “militants” in its headline, triggering sharp backlash for allegedly downplaying the nature of the attack.